In dem Artikel Cuttings (The Lancet, July 8, 2006) hat Clarice Audrey Probleme mit der Public Library of Science = PLoS. Gut zu wissen, dass jemand weiß, worüber er schreibt. 🙂
Perhaps the most extraordinary result [among the 2005 impact factors for medical journals] is that of LoSP [sic] Medicine. They have come in at 8.4 in their first year, hot on the heels of the BMJ. Whatever one’s views about open access, the performance of oSPL [sic] Medicine is remarkable and a tribute to the seriousness of the SLoP [sic] concept.